Indian Rupee: Lost 60% versus Gold since 1999

I was playing around with the Forex graph tool at Economist.com and plotted the chart below:

Indian Rupee vs Gold, 1997-2007

The Indian rupee has lost ~60% of its value versus gold since late 1999; the BSE Sensex-30 market index rose from 5000 to 14000 during the same period - a gain of 180%. BUT, if we were to measure the Sensex in terms of gold, it has gone up only 12% since 1999 !!

Makes you wonder.

Related Posts:

  • Assorted Reading: India’s savings, Buffett, S&P in gold
  • Indian Rupee exchange rate versus NSE CNX IT sector index
  • Rapidly Retreating Rupee
  • May you live in interesting times
  • Indian rupee: Overvalued or just about right?
  • 4 Responses to “Indian Rupee: Lost 60% versus Gold since 1999”

    1. Dr. Dan Says:

      Kaushik,

      Wouldn’t a similar amount invested in FDs in India give u a superior return ?

      60% over 7 years doesnt sound great isnt it ?

      Please advise.

    2. Kaushik Says:

      Well, the 2000-2007 annual return for the Sensex works out to ~16%. If you had invested in FDs, you would have made even lower annual returns, while suffering from the same extent of rupee devaluation.

    3. Dr. Dan Says:

      I dont understand this point at all. My bad !!

      Could you pls tell me what is the ANNUAL return on GOLD from the 2000-2007 period

      I think the 60% is over a 7 year period…which doesnt sound great ?

    4. Kaushik Says:

      Dr Dan: Think of it this way - in 2000, the rupee was worth “1 unit” of gold while the Sensex was at 5000. Now the rupee is worth “0.4 units” of gold, while the Sensex is at 14000.

      Thus, in terms of gold, the Sensex went from 5000 (1 * 5000) in 2000 to 5600 (0.4 * 14000) in 2007. That’s a 12% increase OVER the entire period, not annually!