Games FIIs play, Fertilizer stocks, Geopolitics of oil
Friday, May 30th, 2008If you were watching the market yesterday (especially after 2pm), you can’t have missed the vertical drop in the Nifty index (and Nifty May futures, but NOT Nifty June futures) at 3pm, followed by a super quick reversal. That’s what this article seeks to explain.
- Economic Times: FIIs let short positions expire in May
Being net short in Nifty May futures and 2 crore contracts still outstanding going into the settlement day, FIIs had a simple choice to make.
With no pressure of a short squeeze, they (FIIs) could either have rolled over these short positions into June or had let them expire in May itself. Since rolling over such huge short positions into June was a bit tricky, they decided to let them expire in May. But, how about making a bit of money before these shorts expire?
The Nifty fell like a stone in the consequential last half hour making an intra day swing of over 3%. No wonder, Thursday’s provisional figure revealed that FIIs were net sellers of Indian equities to the tune of a whopping Rs 1,277 crore. On the other hand, Nifty future contracts expiring in June added a 68 lakh shares in open interest to end the day at a huge premium of 23.35 points as compared to a mild discount on Wednesday.
Subsidy payments have skyrocketed in the past four years from Rs15,779 crore in 2004-05 to an estimated Rs95,000 crore in 2008-09, or 1.9% of the gross domestic product. Last year, the subsidy stood at Rs40,338 crore, which includes Rs7,500 crore paid through the first-ever issue of fertilizer bonds.
Fertilizer production requires natural gas, naphtha or furnace oil as feedstock, which account for 70% to 80% of the production cost. All feedstock variations are derivatives of crude petroleum and their prices vary with oil prices. In the past two years, the prices of liquefied natural gas, naphtha and furnace oil have increased by 198%, 50% and 71%, respectively. Out of the 28 functional urea plants in the country, 12 use naphtha or furnace oil as feedstock.
Similarly, the prices of crucial raw materials like phosphoric acid, sulphur and rock phosphate have gone up by 331%, 867% and 297%, respectively, in the past two years.
- Mauldin @ Investors Insight: The Geopolitics of $130 Oil
George and his team are calling the beginning of a new era of global competition. The weapons now won’t be the nukes of the Cold War or the suicide bombers of the post-9/11 world but rather exportable oil and food, and the huge piles of cash that come from exporting surpluses.
The real winners are countries that can export and generate cash in excess of what they need domestically. So countries such as Venezuela, Indonesia and Nigeria might benefit from higher prices, but they absorb all the wealth that is transferred to them. Countries such as Saudi Arabia do not need to use so much of their wealth for domestic needs.
The big losers are countries that not only have to import oil but also are heavily industrialized relative to their economy. Countries in which service makes up a larger sector than manufacturing obviously use less oil for critical economic functions than do countries that are heavily manufacturing-oriented.
The United States is an oil importer, but its relative vulnerability to high energy prices is nothing like it was in 1973, during the Arab oil embargo. De-industrialization has clearly had its upside. At the same time, the United States is a food exporter, along with Canada, Australia, Argentina and others.
Yet another unqiue perspective on oil.





